“You’re Fired!” (Part 3)

So what are the pros and cons of the hire/fire system of the church of America?


  1. It allows a church to filter out candidates that “don’t fit.” The rationale is that some guys wouldn’t be a good fit for the church that is hiring.  For example, a guy from New York City who is used to urban ministry is probably not a great fit for a rural church in the deep south.  While this sounds good, this is a pretty lame pro.    For now, this “pro” exposes one of the main problems with this system:  bringing someone from the outside in.  More on that Friday.

That’s the only pro I can really think of.  What about the cons?


  1. Church leadership is based on a business model. Businesses hire and fire people based upon performance and how much profit they make.  If the church’s main goal was nickels and noses, this may be a pro.  But it isn’t (well, it shouldn’t be).  We’re talking about guys with families depending on their salaries to make ends meet.
  2. Many churches don’t give their guys a contract. In many churches, especially in rural areas, staff and leadership agree to a salary verbally, with nothing on paper.  That should be good enough, but unfortunately it is not.  Many staff people’s jobs are at the whim of church leaders, many of whom may not be qualified to lead.  If they don’t like someone, they simply fire them immediately with no severance pay.  Guys get their pink slip with no back up for the next 60 or 90 days until they can find a new church.  They’re unprotected.
  3. Guys get disillusioned with the church. I have a friend who preached at eight different churches in the span of about twelve years.  Granted, it likely wasn’t just each church’s fault, but still.  The system is broken.  This guy now has turned his back on Jesus and is into Native American spirituality.  His decision?  Yes.  But a string of churches giving him the boot probably didn’t help.  Not only that, but what do wives and children of guys getting hired and fired eventually think of the church?  Undoubtedly, many get fed up with the politics.
  4. It prohibits mentoring leaders from within the church. Imagine if a church and it’s leadership took mentoring and coaching seriously.  Imagine a kid being mentored and trained by the leadership of a church through his middle, high school, and college years.  He could learn leadership, preaching, teaching, etc., from those guys with the goal of coming on board staff.  But with the system the way it is now, this almost never happens (unless “Junior” takes over for Dad).
  5. It promotes consumerism. If you don’t like the way a staff member is doing his job, then “make a change.”  If several members of a congregation don’t like the staff guy for whatever reason, just “make a change.”  The problem with this is that it feeds the consumer mentality, and people begin to think that church is about them.  “We give the money, and therefore we should decide who gets it.”
  6. The attrition rate. I don’t know the current stats, but several years ago, the average guy lasted seven years in ministry.  In those seven years, he stayed at one particular church eighteen to twenty-four months on average.  So, the average staff person graduated from Bible college/seminary with a lot of debut, went to three or four churches and was out of ministry by the time he was thirty wondering what his theology degree would let him do besides preach.
  7. Staffers are shackled by the “golden handcuffs.” Preachers feel the pressure of keeping their salary.  They know that just a few words could cost them their job.  Many will simply avoid saying something, whether from the pulpit or not, that needs to be said in order to maintain their livelihood.  It shouldn’t be this way.
  8. Fallen people are exiled. I know way too many people who’ve been fired from their ministry job because of moral indiscretions.  They were fired immediately and told to leave the church and go elsewhere in the name of “damage control.”  What does that tell the fallen person who really wants to repent?  It tells them that everyone else finds grace and restoration for their sins except me. It also punishes their families, who were likely innocent of any sin.  I’m not saying they shouldn’t have stepped down.  What I am saying is that there has to be a better way.

I’ll start looking at what the better way could look like tomorrow.  In the meantime, share your thoughts.


About Aaron

Aaron is a follower of Jesus. He's married to his smokin' hot wife Laura and is the father of three adorable girls. He enjoys a robust cigar, a complex root beer, a good movie, writing, football, thought-provoking books, and rousing discussions about subjects you're not supposed to talk about (like theology and politics). Religious people irritate him (because he once was one). He's on a quest to find the perfect dry rub and sauce for ribs.
This entry was posted in Church, Intentional Random Thoughts and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to “You’re Fired!” (Part 3)

  1. Greg says:

    So rather than putting out a job search, should the church instead prepare it’s own people to take the positions? And if so, Matthew 13:57- basically summarized, a prophet is not welcome in his own town!

    So then, how do we prepare future preachers, teachers, and ministers to lead our congregations?

    Is it up to the person desiring to preach to find a church that fits them?

    Should mature Christians in the church be willing to change for a new preacher (not doctrinally).

    Am I way off from what you were thinking?

  2. Michael Morris says:

    Your first “con” is more accurate for many churches than you know. It isn’t just “nickels and noses”, it is which nose is attached to the most nickels. Since churches are non-profit organizations and are tax-exempt, they have to keep track of contributions for tax purposes. Most who give (although not all) do so in such a way that they can deduct that from their taxes. Therefore, the leaders know who gives what, and when one of these individuals complains, they would rather fire the “offender” than have the money flow stop by that person walking away. To say that is shameful, is putting it mildly…and we don’t even have to ask what Jesus would do, because we all know.

  3. Justin says:

    Oh, another thought.

    Many times small churches say larger churches soften the gospel in the preaching and teaching to draw larger crowds.

    Well, aren’t small churches softening the gospel when they cater to someone who is accusing a staff member, and in the wrong, because they’re afriad of them walking away?

    The gospel shows us total faith in God, which should give us the courage to do the right thing, reguardless of the fear of a big contributor walking away. God always provides.

    They also ignore Jesus’ teachings, like Matthew 5:18. Or maybe Paul’s teachings in Hebrews 13 about respecting leaders.

    This comment might not be as articulate because its late and Im tired.

    • Aaron says:

      Hey Justin,
      Welcome to RLT. And thanks for sharing your story. It definitely shows the pitfalls of what is happening around the country. And your second comment is drop-dead on target. Real food for thought.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s